compare

Which agent orchestrator should you pick?

Ringlet next to the five tools you're most likely to evaluate. The matrix below is factual — pick the column whose constraints match yours. Two of the comparisons (LiteLLM, OpenRouter) are complementary rather than alternative; the per-vendor pages explain why.

Capability ringlet Claude Squad Conductor LiteLLM OpenRouter
Manages multiple agent CLIs Claude Code, Codex, Grok, Droid, OpenCode Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Aider Claude Code + Codex LLM proxy, not an agent manager model marketplace, not an agent manager
Isolated HOME / config per profile Separate $HOME, history, credentials git-worktree isolation only git-worktree isolation only
Per-profile provider switching Bind any agent to any provider Agent's default provider only Agent's default provider only Central routing rules Hosted marketplace
Token + cost accounting Cross-agent, cross-provider, local Per-task Per-key budgets Hosted dashboard
Keychain-backed credentials macOS Keychain · GNOME Keyring · WinCred Plain env vars Plain env vars Env vars or vault API key in env
Browser-accessible remote sessions WebSocket PTY · sandboxed Local terminal only Local Mac app
Sandboxed execution bwrap (Linux) · sandbox-exec (macOS) Inherits shell git-worktree only
Event hooks (tool use / stop / notify) Shell or webhook on any event Pre/post-call callbacks
Self-hosted Single binary, no daemon ops Local TUI Local Mac app Docker / Python Hosted only
License MIT AGPL-3.0 Source-available MIT proprietary SaaS
bottom line

Ringlet is the orchestration tier — not the parallel-runner tier.

If you want long-lived isolated profiles, provider switching, and cross-agent cost accounting, Ringlet is the answer. If you want many agents on git worktrees, run Claude Squad inside a Ringlet profile.